The model needs to predict tomorrow. The scientist needs to survive today’s data. We’ve got the ones who do both.
A good data scientist doesn’t just tweak hyperparameters; they build resilient, interpretable models that generalize, even when your users stop behaving predictably.
Nulls, typos, nested JSONs, non-normal distributions, these aren’t blockers, they’re Tuesday. Good scientists know how to clean, standardize, and still trust the result.
They speak product, engineering, and exec fluently. From Shapley values to lift scores, they turn complexity into clarity and tell you if your ML project is worth doing.
Recommendation systems, predictive churn, dynamic pricing, user clustering, feature scoring, all built to scale and retrain without setting fire to prod.
From purchase prediction to return likelihood, build models that improve UX and margins. Real-time scoring that doesn’t stall your checkout flow.
Risk stratification, outcome prediction, and population modeling done with regulatory compliance in mind. Clean math meets real-world constraints.
Fraud detection, credit modeling, and time-series forecasting backed by explainable AI and tight governance. No black-box gambling here.
Knows the math, writes the code, and can follow established pipelines. Great at experimentation and prototyping.
1-2 years of experience
Owns models, improves feature engineering, debugs data drift, and collaborates with product and data engineering.
3-5 years of experience
Designs systems, mentors others, productionizes ML workflows, and prevents the team from deploying a neural net when a linear regression would do.
5+ years of experience
Defines data strategy, aligns with product and engineering, and keeps the team focused on models that matter, not just what’s sexy at conferences.
7+ years of experience
Yes. Our data scientists are used to imperfect inputs. They’ll clean, impute, and validate without making your pipeline collapse.
They code. Python, SQL, Pandas, Scikit-learn, PyTorch, TensorFlow, etc. Many also use Airflow, MLflow, dbt, and work in versioned environments.
Yes. They know how to scope a model, communicate tradeoffs, and ship things that don’t die in dev handoff.
Definitely. Some of our best matches are scientists who start with, “You don’t need a model, you need to fix your tracking.”
We’ll work quickly to find a replacement or adjust the talent profile until we get the right match at no extra cost.
You’ve got data. You’ve got questions. What you don’t have is a patient genius who loves math and hates misleading charts. We’ve got a few.
© Copyright CompuForce 2025 – All rights reserved
we are all divisions of